Your trusted source for progressive news and political analysis

Immigration

Border Patrol Stops New Hampshire Man Over Misdemeanor, Denies Entry Home

Chris Landry's recent stop at the Maine border highlights the alarming use of past misdemeanors to deny entry to U.S. citizens. This incident underscores the urgent need for immigration reform and the protection of constitutional rights.

BY: 5 min read
Border Patrol Stops New Hampshire Man Over Misdemeanor, Denies Entry Home
Featured image for: Border Patrol Stops New Hampshire Man Over Misdemeanor, Denies Entry Home

A Family Vacation Turns Into a Nightmare

Chris Landry, a lifelong resident of New Hampshire, faced a shocking ordeal when he was stopped by border patrol agents in Houlton, Maine, upon returning from a family vacation in Canada. This incident, which occurred on July 12, 2025, highlights the alarming lengths to which immigration enforcement can go, impacting even those who have lived in the U.S. their entire lives.

Criminal Records Used as Weapons

Landry was questioned about past misdemeanor convictions and was abruptly told that he could not return home. This raises critical questions about how minor offenses are weaponized in the realm of immigration enforcement. As reported by Massey (2016), the border enforcement strategy has backfired, leading to increased scrutiny of individuals who might otherwise be law-abiding citizens.

Republican governors launch 'energy choice' coalition - E&E ...

Republican governors launch 'energy choice' coalition - E&E ...

Constitutional Rights Under Attack

The use of criminal records as a basis for barring entry to U.S. citizens is a profound violation of constitutional rights. The U.S. legal framework provides protections for citizens, yet incidents like Landry's reveal the fragility of these rights in the hands of immigration enforcement. According to the U.S. Code § 1325, individuals can face severe penalties for improper entry, but it is troubling when these laws are applied to citizens returning home.

Impact on Families and Communities

This incident is not isolated; it reflects a broader trend where families are torn apart by aggressive border policies. The emotional toll on families, particularly those who are immigrants or have immigrant backgrounds, cannot be overstated. Policies that prioritize criminal histories over family ties lead to a culture of fear and mistrust within communities. As highlighted in discussions surrounding immigration enforcement in schools, the ripple effects of such policies extend far beyond the individual, affecting children and entire neighborhoods (Brookings, 2025).

Trump Policy Allowing Border Agents To Screen Asylum-Seekers ...

Trump Policy Allowing Border Agents To Screen Asylum-Seekers ...

The Role of Policy in Perpetuating Injustice

The implications of Landry's case point to a need for urgent immigration reform. As the daughter of immigrants, I am acutely aware of the struggles families face when navigating a system that often views them with suspicion rather than empathy. The harsh realities of the U.S. immigration system disproportionately affect marginalized communities, reinforcing systemic inequities. The Ninth Circuit has made rulings that define how criminal offenses can lead to deportation or barring of entry, but these decisions often fail to consider the lived experiences of individuals caught in this web of legal complexities (Ninth Circuit Court).

The case of Chris Landry serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for advocacy and reform. As we witness increasing enforcement at the borders, we must also recognize the human rights implications of these actions. It is not enough to call for reform; we must actively dismantle the structural barriers that perpetuate injustice against immigrants and their families. The time for change is now, and it begins with amplifying the voices of those impacted by these draconian policies.

Related Articles: Immigration