Recent polling reveals a stark reality: Donald Trump’s proposed ‘big, beautiful bill’ is overwhelmingly rejected by the American public. With a staggering 59% of voters opposing the bill, the implications for millions of families are dire. This legislation threatens to cut nearly $300 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), a lifeline for over 41 million Americans.
Rising Opposition to Trump’s Spending Bill
As reported by Fox News, even conservative media outlets are turning against Trump’s spending proposal. A recent poll conducted by Quinnipiac shows only 27% of respondents in favor of the bill, while a Pew Research study found just 29% support. Fox Business host Liz Claman articulated the frustration of many Americans: “They don’t understand why cuts have to come from programs like SNAP.”
Impact of SNAP Cuts on Vulnerable Communities
The bill’s proposed cuts will not just affect federal budgets; they will directly harm families already struggling to make ends meet. According to the Economic Costs of Cutting SNAP, states that experience larger cuts will see significant economic losses, hitting low-income families the hardest. The proposed restrictions to SNAP will impose stricter work requirements, making it more difficult for families to access necessary food assistance.
Fired fed workers' weekly protests on Capitol Hill ramping up
Misleading Tax Promises for Seniors
In a glaring contradiction, Trump promised “no taxes” on Social Security benefits at a recent event, yet the details of the bill tell a different story. According to experts, the measures included in the reconciliation bill do not protect Social Security from taxation, and instead propose a short-term standard deduction that many seniors will not benefit from. This misrepresentation of the bill could leave tens of millions of elderly Americans without crucial support.
Consequences for Public Health and Nutrition
The anticipated cuts will exacerbate food insecurity and, consequently, public health crises. Research indicates that food assistance programs are crucial for maintaining nutritional standards and preventing diet-related diseases. When families are forced to choose between paying for food and other essentials, the health implications are dire. As the Brookings Institution notes, slashing these funds will lead to increased healthcare costs down the line due to rising rates of nutrition-related illnesses.
On the Record with the White House Press Corps - POLITICO Magazine
Calls for Action and Accountability
With the upcoming vote on this bill, progressive leaders must rally to defend vulnerable populations. It’s imperative to raise awareness about the impacts of cutting SNAP and the deception surrounding tax promises. The American public deserves transparency and accountability from their elected officials, especially when lives are at stake. Advocates must mobilize to pressure lawmakers to reject this harmful legislation and stand up for the rights of those who rely on these essential safety net programs.
