Your trusted source for progressive news and political analysis

Climate Change

139 EPA Employees Punished for Defending Science Against Trump’s Dangerous Deregulation

The EPA has placed 139 employees on administrative leave for signing a petition against the Trump administration's anti-science policies. This unprecedented move raises serious questions about the agency's commitment to environmental protection and scientific integrity.

BY: 5 min read
139 EPA Employees Punished for Defending Science Against Trump’s Dangerous Deregulation
Featured image for: 139 EPA Employees Punished for Defending Science Against Trump’s Dangerous Deregulation

The Environmental Protection Agency has taken a shocking step to silence dissent, placing 139 employees on administrative leave after they signed a petition protesting the Trump administration's anti-science policies. This unprecedented action raises serious questions about the integrity of the agency tasked with protecting our environment and public health.

Employees Take a Stand for Science

Last Thursday, the EPA announced the suspension of these dedicated civil servants, pending an investigation into their participation in a "Stand Up for Science" petition. This petition, signed by over 200 employees, including many EPA retirees, expressed deep concern over the administration's reckless policies that threaten both environmental and public health. As reported by The New York Times, the petition accuses the administration of undermining the agency's core mission and disregarding scientific consensus to benefit corporate polluters.

Zero-Tolerance Policy Shields Corporate Interests

The EPA spokesperson emphasized a zero-tolerance policy for employees who supposedly undermine the administration's agenda. However, this narrative is a thin veil for what appears to be a blatant act of retaliation against those who dare to challenge the status quo. According to AP News, the agency alleges that the petition contains misleading information, yet fails to specify what is incorrect. This lack of transparency raises alarms about the agency's commitment to scientific integrity.

What's next for EPA's Michael Regan? - E&E News by POLITICO

What's next for EPA's Michael Regan? - E&E News by POLITICO

Voices of the Marginalized Amplified

Among the signatories were employees who work on environmental justice projects, critical initiatives that aim to protect the most vulnerable communities from pollution and environmental degradation. The cancellation of billions of grant dollars to these underserved communities and the dismantling of essential tools like EJScreen are direct consequences of the current administration's policies. As emphasized in the petition, the agency's actions erode public trust and jeopardize the health of millions.

Union Leaders Demand Accountability

Nicole Cantello, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Union Local 704, has vehemently defended the employees, stating that the charges against them are baseless and politically motivated. As reported by WGBH News, Cantello and the union are prepared to fight back using First Amendment protections and employment rights. This legal battle highlights the crucial intersection of labor rights and environmental justice, as government employees seek to uphold their duty to protect the health and safety of the public against corporate interests.

Why Trump's push for 'gold-standard science' has scientists ...

Why Trump's push for 'gold-standard science' has scientists ...

Public Health at Risk

The ramifications of the EPA's actions extend far beyond the immediate suspensions. Health-based regulatory standards, including drinking water limits for harmful PFAS chemicals, are now under threat. The administration's focus on deregulation has led to a rollback of crucial protections that safeguard public health, making it easier for polluters to operate unchecked. As noted by Matthew Tejada, former director of the EPA's environmental justice program, this situation reflects a troubling disregard for both the Constitution and the well-being of American citizens.

The petition served as a public declaration of dissent, signaling that these employees are committed to the agency's mission despite the administration's attempts to stifle their voices. The actions taken against them are a stark reminder of the lengths to which the current administration will go to maintain its grip on power, even at the expense of science and public health.

Related Articles: Climate Change